CVSA’s New 2019 North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria is Now in Effect

Starting today, April 1, 2019, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s (CVSA) 2019 North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria is now in effect. The 2019 out-of-service criteria replaces and supersedes all previous versions.

The North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria is the pass-fail criteria for roadside safety inspections. The purpose of the criteria is to identify critical safety violations. Those violations render the driver, vehicle and/or motor carrier out of service until the condition(s) or violation(s) can be corrected or repaired.

In accordance with CVSA bylaws, the changes were proposed to the Class I Members of the Alliance on Oct. 22, 2018, and subsequently ratified on Oct. 31, 2018. Voting members approved 12 changes to the out-of-service criteria which are effective as of April 1, 2019.

The following changes were made to the out-of-service criteria:

  1. Amendment to Part I, Item 4. DRIVER MEDICAL/PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS, a. Skill Performance Evaluation Certificate by modifying the language. A driver who possesses a valid Skill Performance Evaluation (SPE) but is not complying with the SPE requirements should be placed out of service.
  2. Amendment to Part II, Policy Statement regarding how to deal with expired CVSA decals. It was determined that removing old decals before applying a new one is most appropriate.
  3. Amendment to Part II, Item 1. BRAKE SYSTEMS, g. Brake Drums and Rotors (Discs), (2) by adding language and a picture for cracks in structural supports of a brake rotor. If there are cracks through the vents in rotors, a collapse of the rotor is imminent; therefore, the vehicle should be placed out of service.
  4. Amendment to Part II, Item 2. CARGO SECUREMENT, a. through f. by adding subheadings to each out-of-service condition. Subheadings were added to the Cargo Securement section of the out-of-service criteria to provide uniformity with the rest of the criteria and to make it easier to distinguish between subsections.
  5. Amendment to Part II, Item 2. CARGO SECUREMENT, TIEDOWN DEFECT TABLE by adding defective condition language for the Doleco USA Textile Link Tiedown Assembly. Language was added to the Tiedown Defect Table in the out-of-service criteria so that an inspector can adequately determine if the Doleco USA Textile Link Tiedown Assembly is defective once it is in use.
  6. Amendment to Part II, Item 4. DRIVELINE/DRIVESHAFT, b. Universal Joint, (3) by adding a bearing strap to the out-of-service condition. A bearing strap was added to the out-of-service criteria and a descriptive label was added to the current picture of a bearing strap to help identify and clarify the component.
  7. Addition to Part II, adding new Item 5. DRIVER’S SEAT (MISSING), a. to provide an out-of-service condition for a missing driver’s seat. Drivers using a temporary seat rather than a permanent seat that is secured to the vehicle in a workmanlike manner was added to the out-of-service criteria.
  8. Amendment to Part II, Item 6. EXHAUST SYSTEMS, a. through d. by adding subheadings to each out-of-service condition. Subheadings were added to the Exhaust Systems section of the out-of-service criteria to provide uniformity with the rest of the criteria and to make it easier to distinguish between subsections.
  9. Amendment to Part II, Item 7. FRAMES, by adding subsection (5) to the existing NOTE. It was determined that subsection (5) should not pertain to monocoque-style frames.
  10. Amendment to Part II, Item 10. STEERING MECHANISMS, h. Tie Rods and Drag Links, (3) to add an out-of-service condition for a non-manufactured hole. A non-manufactured hole in a drag link should be placed out of service.
  11. Amendment to Part II, Item 16. BUSES, MOTORCOACHES, PASSENGER VANS OR OTHER PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES – EMERGENCY EXITS/ELECTRICAL CABLES AND SYSTEMS IN ENGINE AND BATTERY COMPARTMENTS/SEATING, by adding (TEMPORARY AND AISLE SEATS) to the Critical Vehicle Inspection Item title. This amendment allows vehicles with manufactured seating violations that do not qualify as an out of service condition to receive a CVSA decal.
  12. Amendment to Part III, Items 1. through 10. by adding some subheadings and removing unnecessary language. Revisions were made to Part III of the out-of-service criteria to follow the same format as the rest of the out-of-service criteria.

The CVSA Training Committee, the Education Quality Assurance Team in Canada and the National Training Center in the U.S. will incorporate these changes, as appropriate, into North American Standard Inspection training materials, along with several updated inspection bulletins, inspection procedures, operational policies and training videos.

NOTE:

The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s (CVSA) 2019 North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria app is now available in Apple and Google Play stores for purchase. This is the new out-of-service criteria, which went into effect yesterday, April 1, 2019.

We’re currently offering special half-off pricing for new app purchase and download. The app is $24.99 USD ($34.99 CAD, $479 MXN) for a limited time so don’t miss out on this opportunity to get the out-of-service criteria for half off its regular price.

IF YOU PURCHASED THE APP LAST YEAR: This year only, for early adopters who purchased the 2018 app, you can download the new 2019 out-of-service criteria app for free, as a thank you from CVSA for being among the first to purchase the app last year.

Apple: You’ll first have to delete the 2018 (green) app icon from your device. Then, click here to download the 2019 (yellow) version.

Google Play: Click here then you’ll be prompted to download the new 2019 (yellow) version, which will replace last year’s version.

Western States Trucking Association’s FAAAA Preemption Argument Dismissed by California District Court

On March 29, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California held that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (“FAAAA”) does not preempt the application of the Dynamex ABC Test to a motor carrier for purposes of determining whether owner-operators are considered employees under California’s Wage Orders. Western States Trucking Ass’n v. Schoorl, 2019 WL 1426304, *10 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2019).

In its ruling, the court reasoned that, although the decision in Dynamex applied the ABC Test to interpret the meaning of “engage, suffer, or permit to work” for purposes of California Wage Order No. 9, the definition was equally applicable “across the board to all wage orders” and that recent Ninth Circuit decisions applied, resulting in a decision that Dynamex is not preempted by the FAAAA. See Californians for a Safe and Competitive Dump Truck Transp. v. Mendonca and Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC. In so doing, the court specifically disagreed with the Central District of California’s decision in Alvarez v. XPO Logistics Cartage, LLC.

In its discussion, the court found that the rationale of Mendonca and Dilts applied, and that the generally applicable interpretation of the term “employ” as used in Dynamex “does not run afoul of the FAAAA simply because that interpretation may have some effect on transportation services.” The court then specifically held that the impact of Dynamex on prices, routes, and services of a motor carrier was indirect and insufficient to warrant preemption.

Without further guidance from an appellate court, it is difficult to predict where future courts will land regarding this developing split of authority addressing preemption. In the interim, any motor carrier utilizing owner-operators in California should consider taking steps to avoid becoming a misclassification litigation target and potentially reduce liability exposure in the event of a misclassification determination. For questions about the Dynamex, Western States, or Alvarez decisions, please contact Jim Hanson or Greg Feary.

For a more complete discussion of the Dynamex decision, please see our May 2, 2018 Transportation Law Alert and June 21, 2018 Transportation Law Alert, For a more complete discussion of the Alvarez decision please see our December 5, 2018 Law Alert.

Did You Miss Microsoft’s Ignite Conference?

If you missed Microsoft’s Ignite conference – you can watch session and download presentations here.

30,000 IT professionals converged on Orlando for the five-day Microsoft Ignite conference. Microsoft uses this annual megaconference to share a bevy of new features, products and services announcements with organizations that use and rely on Microsoft’s offerings.

After Satya Nadella set the company’s vision for the near term in his keynote Monday morning, other members of the senior leadership of the company did technical keynotes to dive into the products and services that help drive the overall vision laid out by Nadella.

Over the course of the conference’s five days, Satya Nadella set the company’s vision for the near term in his keynote Monday morning, then more than 1700 sessions were presented by experts from Microsoft. They range from short 20-minute theater sessions, 45-minute break-out sessions, and 75-minute deep dive sessions.

FMCSA Confirms that Cellular-Based ELDs are a Compliance Risk

On May 9, 2017, FMCSA held a meeting to discuss in detail the technical specifications of ELDs. The main purpose of this meeting was to make sure that ELD manufacturers understand how to make ELDs that work as per federal regulations.

In that meeting, the FMCSA confirmed what many people have been fearing for a long time, i.e., cellular-based ELD systems are a compliance risk.

This is extremely important and can be the difference between being compliant and being non-compliant after the December 18, 2017, ELD mandate deadline. So make sure you are paying attention.

In this post, we explain:

  • What are cellular-based ELD systems?
  • What are Bluetooth-based ELD systems?
  • What does FMCSA say about cellular-based ELDs?
  • What should you do next?

One of the questions raised in the meeting was about the ELD’s connectivity with the e-log app in BYOD (bring your own device) based ELD systems.

As you know that an ELD (electronic logging device) is a hardware device connected to the vehicle’s ECM (engine control module) that records vehicle data. The recorded data has to be in sync with the driver’s mobile e-log app for the driver to stay compliant.

There are two ways ELDs relay data e-log app: via cellular networks or a Bluetooth connection. Let’s briefly define both these methods, so you have a better understanding of how this works.

What are Cellular-Based ELD Systems?

As you know that ELDs connect directly with the vehicle’s ECM (Engine Control Module) to record data. It then relays this data to the driver’s mobile device to keep logs updated.

Cellular-based ELD systems rely on cellular network and coverage for the transmission of that data between the electronic logging device and the driver’s mobile device.

In a cellular-based ELD system, the vehicle-connected electronic logging device has a built-in cellular connection. The ELD uses that cellular connection to connect to a cell tower and transmit that data to the driver’s smartphone or tablet.

So … Where’s the Problem?

The problem is that commercial truck drivers often have to operate in remote areas with spotty or absolutely no cellular coverage. In such a scenario, the engine-connected vehicle would not be able to transmit the data to the driver’s mobile device.

As a result, the logs will not be up to date, and the drivers will not be in compliance with the ELD requirements.

FMCSA Also Confirms the Dangers of Cellular-Based ELDs

As mentioned earlier, FMCSA has also confirmed the dangers of cellular-based ELDs in their recent meeting held on May 09, 2017.

Danielle Smith, the Transportation Specialist, Passenger Carrier Division, answered a question and shed some light on how cellular-based ELDs can’t be 100% reliable.

This is what she said:

“If your customer is operating out West, where there is very spotty coverage, they may need to understand that [their] device may not be able to populate the driver’s Record of Duty Status if they do not have that cellular connection.”

What’s Next for Fleets?

Long story short, why buy a cellular-based ELD system that would always be a compliant risk?

Instead, look for an ELD system that relies on Bluetooth or a direct cable connection to sync all the data between ELDs and drivers’ mobile devices. That way, drivers will always have up-to-date data, which would help them stay compliant 24×7, regardless of where they are.

As mentioned earlier, there are several popular ELD providers that are still using cellular-based ELD connections.