NEWS & REPORTS

Federal appeals court finds overtime pay exemption for interstate truckers applies to intrastate oilfield drivers

Nov 11, 2024 | Industry News

Tyson Fisher

A federal appellate court has found that although Texas oil tanker drivers never leave the Lone Star state, they are still involved in interstate commerce and therefore exempt from overtime pay.

Earlier this year, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court’s decision denying oil transporter Ace Gathering’s motion to dismiss a class-action wage lawsuit filed by tanker drivers. The case centers on interpretations of “interstate commerce” within the federal overtime pay exemption for motor carriers.

Most of the facts of the case are straightforward and undisputed. Tanker drivers for Ace Gathering load up crude oil from an oil field in Texas and transport that oil to a pipeline also located in Texas. For the truck drivers, their entire operations take place solely in Texas, making their journeys intrastate only.

Despite these intrastate-only trips, Ace Gathering did not offer drivers overtime pay, citing the Fair Labor Standards Act motor carrier exemption. That exemption applies when the driver is:

  1. Employed by a carrier subject to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction
  2. Engaged in activities directly affecting the safety of operation of motor vehicles in the transportation on public highways of property in interstate or foreign commerce

Neither party disputes the first requirement, and both parties agree on the “safety-affecting activities” portion of the second requirement. The disagreement is on whether the drivers engage in interstate commerce, exempting them from overtime pay.

According to the Department of Labor, truck drivers are exempt from overtime pay when they are involved in interstate commerce or “connect with an intrastate terminal (rail, air, water or land) to continue an interstate journey of goods that have not come to rest at a final destination.”

Ace Gathering argued that the oil being transported continues beyond Texas state lines after a trucker delivers it to the pipeline.

Once a trucker drops off oil at a Texas pipeline, that oil goes to either an out-of-state refinery or to export markets for shipment outside the U.S. Although the trucking portion of the oil cargo is intrastate, it is only one leg of a longer journey outside of Texas. Therefore, tanker drivers are engaged in interstate commerce and exempt from overtime pay.

However, Judge Lee Rosenthal of the of the Southern District of Texas federal court found that Ace Gathering had no vested interest in oil once it crossed state lines via pipeline. The company’s customers – oilfield and pipeline operators – were all based in Texas. What happens to the oil after it leaves the trucks, Rosenthal argued, is of no interest to Ace Gathering.

But on appeal, the Fifth Circuit rejected that argument. Simply put, court precedent has established that a trucker is engaged in interstate commerce when transporting goods “ultimately bound for destinations beyond Texas, even though the route of the particular carrier is wholly within one state.”

“So while the crude haulers’ transportation of the crude oil is indeed entirely intrastate, their transportation is but one segment of the crude oil’s larger interstate journey and, by all indications, part of the crude oil’s ‘practical continuity of movement’ out of the state,” the appellate panel ruled. “Thus, under controlling precedent, we tread no new ground in holding that purely intrastate transportation rises to the level of interstate commerce when the product is ultimately bound for out-of-state destinations, just as the crude oil was here.”

Confusion surrounding overtime pay exemption

In a concurring statement, Judge Andrew Oldham highlighted the confusing nature of the overtime pay exemption.

Oldham focused on a 1971 Department of Labor interpretive rule exempting certain employees from overtime pay. That rule refers to language in the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 that defines interstate commerce as “between any place in a state and any place in another state or between places in the same state through another state.” Oldham states that based on the text, the 1971 rule would exempt only drivers “who actually crossed state or national borders in the course of their commercial activities.”

However, statutory changes in 1978 and 1995 more broadly defined interstate commerce to include intrastate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. Despite those changes, the Department of Labor has not updated its 1971 interpretive law, according to Oldham.

With conflicting information, the courts have been forced to devise “multiple, unmanageable standards for making overtime decisions,” Oldham pointed out. That includes an eight-factor balancing test to determine if a driver has a reasonable expectation of interstate transportation.

Without more clarity from Congress or the Department of Labor, courts instead rely on confusing precedent in overtime pay exemption cases involving certain intrastate trucking operations.

“It is unclear how the 1971 rule comports with the text of the relevant statutes,” Oldham stated. “And it is unclear how our precedents comport with the 1971 rule, which says nothing about factors like the good’s ultimate destination or the shipper’s state of mind. Incoherent as they might be, the precedents bind us.”

Congress can clear confusion regarding overtime pay exemptions

One way to end any confusion regarding overtime pay for truckers is to eliminate the exemption altogether.

That is exactly what the bipartisan GOT Truckers Act will do if passed by Congress and signed into law. Introduced by Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J., and Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., the bill simply removes the overtime pay exemption from the Federal Labor Standards Act. Consequently, all employee truck drivers will receive overtime regardless of whether they drive interstate or intrastate, ending any confusion around the definition of interstate commerce.

Although the bill would apply only to company drivers, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association contends that forcing shippers and receivers to value a trucker’s time would create change throughout the industry.

“America’s truckers keep our nation’s economy moving, and without the hard work of these men and women, our supply chain would grind to a halt,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said. “Unbelievably, trucking is one of the only professions in America that is denied guaranteed overtime pay. We are way past due as a nation in valuing the sacrifices that truckers make every single day. This starts with simply paying truckers for all of the time they work.”

Truck drivers can go to FightingForTruckers.com to encourage their lawmakers to co-sponsor the GOT Truckers Act.

About the Author

NEWS & REPORTS

Texas Supreme Court Hears Werner’s $100M Verdict Appeal

Following are two articles regarding the $100M verdict against Werner Enterprises.  If you or one of your commercial trucks is involved in an accident, please engage help.  Get someone you trust, and of course I am glad to help - JoelBeal@JBATelematics.com.  No mater...

Lifesaving Beats: Songs Can Help with CPR Training

Bahar Gholipour CHICAGO — The familiar tune of the Bee Gees song "Stayin' Alive" has been used for medical training for quite a few years now: It has the right beat — not to mention, the perfect title — for providing CPR's chest compressions at the right pace to...

How “Ghost Drivers” Can Skirt HOS Regulations

KBG Injury Law In the modern, digital era, we have all manner of devices, gadgets, and apps that follow our every move, but an electronic logging device, or ELD, is a tracker that is specific to the interstate trucking (and commercial bus) industry. ELDs replaced...

Ghosts in the Machine

Scopelitis   Since the mandated implementation of Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs) in December 2019, the trucking industry has largely – sometimes begrudgingly – accepted them and their role in managing Hours of Service (HOS) regulations.  However, despite their...

The Differences Between a Criminal Case and a Civil Case

Joseph Bui Civil cases generally only result in monetary damages or orders to do or not do something, known as injunctions. A criminal case may involve both jail time and monetary punishment. The American justice system addresses the wrongdoings that people commit...

CATEGORIES