NEWS & REPORTS

Cost-savings from new technologies and other programs have proven elusive.

Nov 5, 2019 | Uncategorized

Below find an article by the United States Postal Service Office of the Inspector General. Technology does not solve problems. People solve problems using the right technology in the right manner.

Case in point: Dynamic Route Optimization (DRO), a technology-based initiative to reduce miles and costs for surface transportation. The U.S. Postal Service did not save the $22.4 million it projected for fiscal years (FYs) 2017 and 2018, our recent audit report found.

DRO allows Highway Contract Routes (HCRs) to change from a fixed-price contract with set, or static, routes to a rate-per-mile contract with varying departure times, travel plans, and mail types transported based on mail volume. This “dynamic” approach allows the Postal Service to optimize routes to reduce mileage and transportation costs – critical for containing costs in the overall HCR program, which moves mail between post offices and other designated stops. In FY 2018, the Postal Service spent $4.3 billion on HCR transportation.

The Postal Service awards DRO contracts for sites selected for conversion from static to dynamic contracts and uses an approved commercial off-the-shelf software and a web application to generate weekly dynamic manifests at the DRO sites.

But USPS didn’t identify and resolve program issues before national rollout of DRO and thus fell short of planned savings. Despite spending $32.7 million in total investments on DRO in FYs 2017 and 2018, most of the sites were still running static routes. Only five of the 34 sites were fully optimized and only one was operating dynamically.

Our audit found that the commercial software and web-based application the Postal Service used for its national rollout required continual re-configuration. We also found management and oversight of the program needed better controls. We noted that USPS has initiated improvements to the program this fiscal year, including appointing an acting national program manager for DRO.

About the Author

NEWS & REPORTS

ATRI: Value of Risk and Safety Per Annual Operating Expense

Doug Marcello Why It Matters The value of safety and risk is not theoretical. ATRI’s Annual Operational Cost of Trucking Study quantifies its value and importance to the bottom line. And with anticipated premium increases, it is now more vital than ever to reduce risk...

How to mount an effective DataQs challenge

Todd Dills & Max Heine Clark Freight Lines, with 180 trucks, used to routinely file lots of DataQs RDRs (Requests for Data Review) but met with little success, said Vice President Danny Schnautz. He gave the example of a violation for an air leak that wasn’t in...

SAFETY AS AN INVESTMENT

Doug Marcello WHY IT MATTERS:  Safety protects profits, not draining it as an expense burden many erroneously believe. WHAT’S THE PROBLEM:  Too many view safety as just an expense.  A burden.  A drain. The folks in finance who live-and-die by the P & L statements,...

Why FMCSA keeps revoking ELDs, and how to tell if yours is next

Alex Lockie The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration recently revoked three electronic logging devices in a two-week span (One Plus ELD, ELD ONE and Nationwide ELD). Now, an ELD service provider is speaking up about what he feels has changed -- and possible...

CATEGORIES